Middle East Research and Information Project: Critical Coverage of the Middle East Since 1971

The present era of counter-terrorism wars has severely damaged what, in hindsight, looked like a solid international consensus about which forms and levels of violence are “legal” in war and what “humanitarian” limits are imposed on such violence. The counter-terrorism paradigm of “with us or against us” in which the latter—and all that is proximate to it—is regarded as targetable upends the important distinction in international humanitarian law (IHL) between civilians and combatants and inflates the norm of proportionality to justify indiscriminate violence. This paradigm is the dominant strategic approach in the US “war on terror” and Israel’s “war model” approach in the Occupied Territories, as well as among regimes like Syria and Saudi Arabia.

To continue reading this article, please login or subscribe.

How to cite this article:

Lisa Hajjar "Israel as Innovator in the Mainstreaming of Extreme Violence," Middle East Report 279 (Summer 2016).