MERIP
Middle East Report
Middle East Report Online
Newspaper Op-Eds
Contact Info
Subscribe
Back Issues
Internships
Giving
Search
Subscribe Online to
Middle East Report

Order a subscription and back issues to the award-winning magazine Middle East Report.

Click here for the order page.


SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS

Report of the Task Force for a Responsible Withdrawal from Iraq June 2008 [Click to view PDF]


Primer on Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict
Click here (PDF)

[Click here for HTML version]

 

 

 

MER 222 Table of Contents

Victims of Circumstance

Anthony Shadid

Read Anthony Shadid's Sidebar to this article: The Shape of Afghhanistan to Come

It was 3 am in Qala Niazi when the drone of US bombers rumbling through the night sky awoke villagers sleeping off a night of festivities last December 29. Within half an hour, a storm of sound and fury unleashed by the warplanes had ended, and the hamlet was no longer. December 29 was the morning after 15-year old Inzar's wedding party, an occasion that had drawn guests and relatives from Jalalabad in the east, Khost in the south and the nearby city of Gardez. Because they had traveled long distances, on roads particularly treacherous after the Taliban's hasty retreat, many chose to spend the night in the cluster of walled compounds built of dried mud and hay. The bombs entombed many of them, including the bride and groom. Strewn across the sun-baked plain in southern Afghanistan was the detritus of their lives -- a pillow adorned with red roses, a purple mattress, a suitcase and a dusty blue water pitcher.

Hajji Sattar describes how his son Ameen was injured in a US airstrike, Kandahar hospital, January 2002. (John Moore/AP Photo)

The Pentagon said the B-52 bomber and two B1-B bombers were targeting senior Taliban and al-Qaeda leaders and speculated that the destruction was made worse by an ammunition depot at the site. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said "multiple intelligence sources" had confirmed the target. Villagers, hospital officials and the UN say the victims were civilians. The UN put the number of dead at 52, nearly half of them children. Villagers said at least 80 people were killed. The director of the hospital in nearby Gardez said 100 had died.

More certain than the numbers was the anger that lingered weeks later. "Try to understand. Nobody is here. Why are you sending planes and bombing us? Nobody is here," said Bai Jan, a 45 year-old man from neighboring Spin Kalay who said he helped bury what was left of the bodies to hide them from wandering dogs.

Who's Counting

In the history of the US military campaign in Afghanistan that began in October, Qala Niazi, about 100 miles south of Kabul, will likely stand out.

It remains one of the highest civilian tolls from bombing at a single site. It marked the first time the UN went public with specific concerns about the unintended consequences of US strikes. And the Pentagon's defense foreshadowed the growing questions the US military would face in defending bombing and attacks that killed innocents in the pursuit of an elusive clique of Taliban and al-Qaeda leaders who -- in remarkable numbers -- have managed to escape the American dragnet.

While the Pentagon has insisted since the start of the conflict that it will not keep track of the numbers killed in US attacks, a fuller picture has begun to emerge of civilian casualties through visits to bombing sites by journalists and others.

The accounting remains incomplete: Afghanistan is home to some of the world's most rugged terrain, with entire regions cut off in winter. Impassable roads and growing lawlessness make travel risky. The dead are buried quickly -- by tradition, before sundown on the day of deaths -- making a tally difficult even days after bombs land. But it is becoming clear that claims by Rumsfeld and other US military officials that fewer civilians have died in Operation Enduring Freedom than in any previous campaign are likely untrue. A definitive toll will probably prove impossible, but there is little question that at least 1,000 civilians died, and likely many more, in attacks that saw US forces expend 18,000 bombs, missiles and other ordnance since October 7, 2001.

A report from the Project on Defense Alternatives, a private think tank, estimated conservatively that 1,000 to 1,300 had died by the end of December. This report projects that Afghan civilians were killed at a higher rate than in the Kosovo bombing campaign.

Whatever the count, the toll has raised questions among those supporting the war about the effectiveness of bombing -- still a blunt instrument despite talk of precision weapons -- in targeting a relatively small group of combatants. Civilians were rarely warned of attacks and apparently never in areas populated by Pashtuns, the largest Afghan ethnic group that formed the backbone of the defeated Taliban. More and more, Afghans claim intelligence provided to US forces by local factions was motivated as much by settling scores as eliminating cadres of al-Qaeda.

Afghans who bore the brunt of bombing are angry and confused -- sentiments that contrast with the popularity the US government enjoys elsewhere in the country. From Qala Niazi to Zhawar Kili along the Pakistani border, from Herat in the west to Zadran in the Pashtun heartland, scenes of grief, loss and flight have been repeated across a landscape defined like no other by war.

On the Winning Side?

Ishaq Suleiman was a village that always saw the Taliban as invaders. But the warren of mud huts congregated outside the city of Herat had the misfortune of calling a Taliban base its neighbor. After the US campaign began in October, the Taliban sent tanks, artillery and their once ubiquitous pickups to the village for cover. Villagers knew the consequences.

In this Dari-speaking region that hoped to be on the winning side in the war, people heard warnings in Dari and Pashtun to leave the area, apparently aired by Americans in aircraft overhead. They saw the bombing of the base less than a mile away. They even banded together to put stones in the street to stop the Taliban vehicles from entering. "But we didn't leave our houses," said Ghaus-u Din, 45, his black turban askew in the winter wind. "If we left, thieves would come and steal all our belongings."

On November 1, the war arrived in Ishaq Suleiman, flashes of light matched by sounds of shattered glass. Residents say dozens of bombs landed in the village on five days over a nearly two-week period. In all, according to AREA, an Afghan non-governmental organization funded by the German government that tracked civilian casualties, 12 people were killed and 14 wounded. The bombing affected 42 families, AREA said, and caused $17,350 in damage.

Among the dead was 60-year old Hajji Mohammed, whose house was wrecked by a bomb that landed about 15 feet away in the dirt street outside. Its target was a Taliban truck that villagers say had driven off half an hour before. On a cold winter morning, Ghulam Nabi picked through the mud, hay and brick that was his brother's house -- a solitary mud arch perched over the rubble piled in his former bedroom. He remembered the night that he lost his brother, and his desperation to find his 12-year old son Ghaus-u Din and 7-year old daughter Adila. "I heard an explosion and everywhere was full of dust and smoke. I was desperately looking for my daughter. I saw a body in front of me. I went up to it but there was smoke, dust and it was dark. I went closer and I touched the face and I saw it was a man with a gray beard. I saw there was another body in front of me. He was still alive, and he was screaming," said Nabi, wearing a turban and khaki jacket. "I was running like a madman, here and there. Then I saw my wife running toward me. When I got to her, she told me our son and daughter were wounded in another village."

The Pentagon, when asked about Ishaq Suleiman, said the village was occupied by forces of the Taliban's 17th Mechanized Infantry Division and 4th Armored Brigade. Even in villages, it said, trucks and equipment "were still authorized military targets."

Convoy of Death

The US attack on a convoy December 20 in the restive southeastern region of Paktia has emerged as a case study in the dangers of intelligence delivered by warlords and faction leaders to settle their own scores. The Pentagon says the convoy was carrying Taliban leaders; survivors claim the convoy was bringing tribal leaders to the inauguration of Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan's interim leader, and that it was targeted by a warlord seeking to eliminate his rivals.

The debate over the convoy's identity paid less attention to the attacks' other targets: a cluster of nearby homes and a village about six miles away that was bombed hours later. The results were no less devastating. The aerial assault there spanned miles, persisted into the next morning and -- according to villagers -- left dozens dead.

Musa Khan's family was among the first victims. Ten minutes after hitting the convoy, warplanes struck his house on a hill where relatives from two other houses had gathered. Twelve were killed -- Musa's four brothers and three sisters, plus two cousins and three aunts. The 22-year old villager, his face weathered by the sun, was tending his sheep and goats when the attack started and watched the scene from a distance. He could do nothing to help. "Everybody was climbing up the mountains, trying to hide," remembered Musa, standing in front of the gutted remains of his home. Charred trees were snapped like toothpicks, and a burned car sat idly in front. Four craters 20 feet deep marked a path about 30 feet long that tore through the house and down the hill in front.

Musa Khan insists his family were victims of circumstance and had no connections to the Taliban, despite the presence of a nearby Taliban base. "Why did Americans do this to us? We are not Arabs, we are not Taliban. We are ordinary people,'' said Khan, who buried his family in a cemetery three hours away at the clan's ancestral village.

By 3 am the US attack was broadened to the village of Bekhere, a half-hour drive away along a riverbed in a sheltered valley that the Pentagon has described as "an active staging and coordinating base for al-Qaeda activities." The bombing lasted until noon. Villagers say 63 people were killed, perhaps more; an Afghan non-governmental group that tracked casualties in the region put the number at 44.

The village was targeted, residents say, because the convoy stopped in front of it, trying to leave the valley by another road. The route, they say, was snowed in, forcing the convoy to turn around and go back out. The flicker of their car lights proved fatal. "They stopped over there," said 26-year old Bala Khan, pointing at the road that ran along the village. "They turned off their lights but the airplane had already seen them."

His two brothers were killed in the attack, and his home, along with 15 other buildings, was destroyed. The ruins cut a swatch of destruction along the side of the hill.

As with others in Bekhere, Bala still wears the face of disbelief, his eyes blinking in rapid fire. His words pour out: "I have nothing left. Even the cloak on my shoulder is borrowed from someone else."

"In the Vicinity"

Weeks after the bombing of Qala Niazi, the landscape was still littered with tattered sandals, a baby's shoe and shredded women's clothes, some of them embroidered in greens, purples and oranges. A mattress lay near a can of vegetable oil and a metal canister spilling flour. Nearby was an empty sack of wheat emblazoned with USA and two clasped hands, the symbol of the US Agency for International Development.

"Is this Taliban?" asked Jan, holding a baby's green sandal in his hands made dirty by rummaging in the rubble. "Is this al-Qaeda or Taliban? No."

Jan and another villager, 55-year old Niaz Mohammed, said at least ten villagers ran from the village after the bombing began. The UN, citing a reliable source, put the number at 10 to 20. They were all killed by other bombs about 100 yards away. At that site, three deep tunnels, possibly dug by bombs designed to destroy bunkers, lay open. Into one cascaded a canal that once carried water to a nearby village. Dried blood was still spattered on the dirt, and a fragment of bone lay nearby.

There was no doubt that ammunition was stored at the site -- though villagers differed on how it got there. At one of the five compounds, piles were still stacked like a bountiful harvest, the metallic green of the cases reflecting the sun.

US military spokesmen said the presence of the ammunition made Qala Niazi a "valid military target." They did not rule out civilian deaths in the village, but placed the blame on al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Lt. Col. Dave Lapan at the Pentagon cited the discrepancies in the casualty estimates. "Even people on the ground can't agree on what the numbers are," Lapan told the Boston Globe. "It goes to the nature of what is a civilian and what is a combatant. This bombing was not a mistake. This was a military target. Were civilians killed? Possibly. If they were killed, they were killed because they were in the vicinity of a military target."

Khanzad Gul, director of the hospital in Gardez, about three miles from the village, called the attack "a misunderstanding." "They think anyone who grew beards is an al-Qaeda member," said bearded Gul. If that's the case, he commented, "they should take me. But I'm a doctor and I did my study in [Soviet] Russia."

Villagers said the houses in Qala Niazi belonged to the Niazi clan, a far-flung Pashtun family of former nomads. The houses were built about five years ago on a wide plain bordered on one side by a snow-capped range, and on the other by formidable mountains painted in reds, purples, browns and grays. Other hamlets were clustered along the plain. The surrounding province of Paktia was long a Taliban stronghold, and a compound said to house its soliders a mile or so away bore the signs of a recent bombing. Gul and another hospital official, Nur Mohammed, said the Taliban in the region were from Kandahar and had fled back to that province after the fall of Kabul in November. "Everybody escaped the area. Nobody is here," Mohammed said.

Too Close to Tora Bora

The bombing over nearly two weeks in January of a vast complex of caves tucked in a dusty ravine near the Pakistani border was the last sustained, but possibly most inconclusive, attack in the American air war. The Pentagon claims the strikes destroyed dozens of buildings and sealed more than 50 caves that hid Taliban and al-Qaeda operatives. Villagers and local commanders say the base was effectively abandoned -- by Arab fighters before the air war even began, by Afghans within days of the first bombs falling in the country. "Nobody was here. It was empty," said Khali Gul, a villager standing amid charred willow trees, red brick and a junkyard of destroyed weaponry -- artillery, tanks and a century-old cannon with wooden wheels. More numerous in the Zhawar area were civilians, dangerously exposed in villages perched atop the cliffs that sheltered US-backed mujahideen at the base in the 1980s, then the Taliban, Arabs and other foreign fighters in the 1990s.

Local commanders and villagers say that in Zhawar Kili, less than a mile away, US bombing killed seven people and destroyed at least ten homes. In Zanshura Kili, about a mile away, eight people were killed and three homes destroyed. In other villages -- Lali Kili and Shudyac Kili -- at least 40 homes were damaged or destroyed, they said. The strikes forced 3,000 people to flee their homes. Many headed for Pakistan.

At one point during the attacks, the bombing was so fierce and the villagers so isolated that a group of them decided to embark on a 20-mile trek through ravines and over hilltops to Khost. They went to the city's market, where by loudspeaker, they pleaded for help in digging out the bodies and burying the dead. "Only innocent people died in those bombings," said Zawar Khan, a 38-year old commander who lived in Zhawar Kili. "None of those people are dying," he said, pointing to the remnants of the base that once housed Taliban and al-Qaeda.

The Pentagon averred even in January that the base remained "a staging point for escaping al-Qaeda members." But the scenes there told a different story. In Zhawar Kili, a red, blue and green pillow sat in one of four 30-foot craters. The carcass of a cow rotted in the sun, its head still tied to a post laying on the ground. A cot jutted from the side of a hill, like a fractured bone. Along another crater was a broken tea set. Next to it was a child's red sandal. The other sandal was a few feet away in a box with a yellow comb, beads and a small plate.

Mawla Jan, whose house was destroyed, was digging through the rubble, his black shirt soiled with dirt and sweat. He said he lost 60 sheep and goats and the equivalent of $6,000 in Pakistani rupees that he had safeguarded in the house. "Everything has been destroyed," he said, waving his dirty hands. "Nothing is left for us. All we have are the clothes we wear. What should I say to the government, what should I say to the United States? They destroyed us. What should I say to them?"

"It's cruel," he continued, shaking his head. "The base is there and they hit our house here. It's cruel. How can I convince the Americans that none of al-Qaeda and Taliban are here?" Echoing others, he added softly, "You have to be sure."

DonateNow

Search MERIP

MERIP OP-EDS
Rebranding the Iraq War
Antiwar.com
August 24, 2010
Chris Toensing

The war in Iraq is over. Or so the government and most media outlets will claim on Sept. 1, by which time thousands of U.S. troops will have departed the land of two rivers for other assignments. With this phase of the drawdown, says President Barack Obama, “America’s combat mission will end.” The Pentagon is marking the occasion by changing the name of the Iraq deployment from Operation Iraqi Freedom to Operation New Dawn. Full Story>>


Ethno-Sectarian Approach Likely to Have Lasting Consequences
Bitter Lemons International
July 22, 2010
Chris Toensing

Which American has done the most harm to Iraq in the twenty-first century? The competition is stiff, with George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and L. Paul Bremer, among others, to choose from. But, given his game efforts to grab the spotlight, it seems churlish not to state the case for Vice President Joe Biden. Full Story>>


It's Time for Israel to End the Gaza Siege
The Wayne Independent (Honesdale, PA)
June 29, 2010
Bayann Hamid

Why would the Israeli navy commandeer boats carrying collapsible wheelchairs and bags of cement to the Gaza Strip? Israel says that the aid convoys are trying to "break the blockade" of the densely populated Palestinian enclave. But why is there a blockade in the first place? Full Story>>


Sects and the City
New York Times Magazine
May 17, 2010
Moustafa Bayoumi

I had almost forgotten I’d sent in an application when the e-mail message appeared, like Mr. Big, out of nowhere. “Hi, Moustafa,” it began, as if we were old friends. “Thank you for e-mailing us regarding your interest in working on ‘Sex and the City 2.’ ”

No way. Last August, I half-jokingly answered an e-mail message posted on a list-serv requesting “lots of Middle Eastern men and women” as extras for the second “Sex and the City” movie (opening this week). Although I must have been one of the very few in the tri-state area to possess all the talents requested in the e-mail (legal to work, Middle Eastern and between 18 and 70 years old), I still never thought I would be selected. Two months later, I got the call. Full Story>>


A Web Smaller Than a Divide
The New York Times
May 14, 2010
Sinan Antoon

At first glance, there’s a clear need for expanding the Web beyond the Latin alphabet, including in the Arabic-speaking world. According to the Madar Research Group, about 56 million Arabs, or 17 percent of the Arab world, use the Internet, and those numbers are expected to grow 50 percent over the next three years. Many think that an Arabic-alphabet Web will bring millions online, helping to bridge the socio-economic divides that pervade the region. But such hopes are overblown. Full Story>>


A New Conversation Peace
The National (Abu Dhabi)
April 9, 2019
Chris Toensing

Iyad Allawi, the not terribly popular interim premier of post-Saddam Iraq, is in a position to form a government again because he won over the Sunni Arabs residing north and west of Baghdad in the March 7 elections. The vote, while it did not “shove political sectarianism in Iraq toward the grave,” as Allawi would have it, rekindled the hopes of many that “nationalist” sentiment has asserted itself over communal loyalty. Full Story>>


Arming Yemen Against Al-Qaeda
The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)
January 21, 2010
Sheila Carapico

Americans got a crash course on Yemen for Christmas.

That’s because we’ve wanted to know more about the little-known, dirt-poor country in southwestern Arabia where the “underwear bomber” who tried to blow up a plane—bound for Detroit from Nigeria on Christmas Day—says he was trained. President Barack Obama says, correctly, that “large chunks” of Yemen “are not fully under government control.” So it seems to make sense to strengthen the Yemeni government, to get at “al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula,” as the local gang of Islamist extremists is known. Full Story>>


Christmas is Bittersweet in Bethlehem
The Milford Daily News (Milford, MA)
December 24, 2009
George Rishmawi

Bethlehem, Palestine is a special place to celebrate Christmas. It’s home to the Church of the Nativity and the field where shepherds, tending their flocks by night, spotted the star heralding Jesus’ birth. But apart from the historical mystique, here in Bethlehem we celebrate Christmas much like Christians throughout the world. We hang lights from the rooftops. We erect a tree in Manger Square. We host a Christmas market. Our children carol and perform Christmas pageants. Christmas in Bethlehem, as elsewhere, is a time for family, peace, love and joy. Full Story>>


More Troops Won't Do It
The Herald (New Britain, CT)
November 13, 2009
Chris Toensing

For the past two months, President Barack Obama has been weighing Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s request to send an additional 40,000 troops to Afghanistan to “disrupt, dismantle and defeat” al-Qaeda. That same effort, according to Obama, entails ensuring that the Taliban can’t regain control of the country. But a military strategy alone won’t beat al-Qaeda or the Taliban. Achieving lasting stability in Afghanistan will require national political reconciliation, the establishment of a functioning, accountable political system, and a credible government. In this respect, the outcome of Afghanistan’s presidential election, marred by cheating, was a step in the wrong direction. Full story>>


Fort Hood Shootings: Again We Will Be Judged for Acts We Didn't Commit
The Guardian
November 6, 2009
Moustafa Bayoumi

So much is still unknown about the shooting at Fort Hood Army base and the motives of the alleged shooter, Nidal Malik Hasan, but still I have that same queasy feeling in my stomach that I've had before: this will not be good for Muslims. Full Story>>


Western Sahara Poser for UN
Reuters (Africa Blog)
April 28, 2009
Jacob Mundy

Morocco serves as the backdrop for such Hollywood blockbusters as Gladiator, Black Hawk Down and Body of Lies. The country’s breathtaking landscapes and gritty urban neighbourhoods are the perfect setting for Hollywood’s imagination.

Unbeknown to most filmgoers, however, is that Morocco is embroiled in one of Africa’s oldest conflicts - the dispute over Western Sahara. This month the UN Security Council is expected to take up the dispute once more, providing US President Barack Obama with an opportunity to assert genuine leadership in resolving this conflict. But there’s no sign that the new administration is paying adequate attention. Full Story>>


Letters, He Gets Letters
Bitter Lemons International
March 26, 2009
Chris Toensing

Shortly before assuming office, President Barack Obama was handed a missive signed by such Washington luminaries as ex-national security advisers Zbigniew Brezezinski and Brent Scowcroft, urging him to “explore the possibility” of direct contact with Hamas. One month after he entered the White House, Obama received an epistle from Ahmad Yousef, a Gaza-based spokesman for the Islamist movement, making the same recommendation. “There can be no peace without Hamas,” Yousef told the New York Times when asked about the letter's contents. “We congratulated Mr. Obama on his presidency and reminded him that he should live up to his promise to bring real change to the region.”

There is no word, as yet, on how the foreign policy doyens' message was received, but Yousef's occasioned a huffy US rebuke of the UN Relief Works Agency, whose top official in Gaza, Karen Abu Zayd, passed the letter to Sen. John Kerry while he was visiting the devastated territory in mid-February. Even a single sealed envelope, it seems, creates the appearance that the Obama administration is breaking with the US vow, enunciated first under President George W. Bush, not to speak with Hamas until it agrees to renounce violence, abide by previous Palestinian agreements with Israel and recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Full Story>>


Elections Are Key to Darfur Crisis
The Montreal Gazette
March 7, 2009
Khalid Medani

It has been quite a week. For the first time, the international community indicted a sitting president of a sovereign state. Omar al-Bashir of Sudan stands accused by the International Criminal Court in The Hague of "crimes against humanity and war crimes" committed in the course of the Khartoum regime's brutal suppression of the revolt in the country's far western province of Darfur. Having indicted two other figures associated with the regime in 2007, ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo began building a case against the man at the top, and on Wednesday, the court issued a warrant for Bashir's arrest. Full Story>>


Out of the Rubble
The National
January 23, 2009
Mouin Rabbani

Speaking to his people on January 18, hours after Hamas responded to Israel’s unilateral suspension of hostilities with a conditional ceasefire of its own, the deposed Palestinian Authority prime minister Ismail Haniyeh devoted several passages of his prepared text to the subject of Palestinian national reconciliation. For perhaps the first time since Hamas’s June 2007 seizure of power in the Gaza Strip, an Islamist leader broached the topic of healing the Palestinian divide without mentioning Mahmoud Abbas by name.

At a press conference the following day convened by Abu Ubaida, the spokesperson of the Martyr Izz al Din al Qassam Brigades, the Hamas military wing, the movement went one step further. “The Resistance”, Abu Ubaida intoned, “is the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people”. Full Story>>


The Horrors of Israel's Peace
Al Ahram Weekly
January 22-28, 2009
Samera Esmeir

Three weeks after the war on Gaza, Israel declared a unilateral ceasefire but refused to terminate its so-called defensive operations. In response, Hamas declared a ceasefire for one week, until the withdrawal of Israeli troops has been completed. For many in the West, the ceasefire might seem like an occasion to celebrate, for the cessation of military hostilities on both sides will perhaps renew the peace process. But there are reasons to be critical of this ceasefire, since it continues the situation in which Israel acts unilaterally. What we are actually witnessing is a new phase of the catastrophe in Gaza. While the characteristics of this phase are not yet known, Israel's violence has become ever more evident. And perhaps this is why Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert did not mention the word "peace" once in the speech he gave to announce the ceasefire. The "peace process" might soon be revealed as the other side of the coin to war -- its continuation by other means -- that simultaneously feeds it. Full Story>>


A Battleground for the Foreseeable Future
Bitter Lemons International
September 11, 2008
Chris Toensing

Bob Woodward’s four books chronicling the wars of President George W. Bush are sensitive barometers of conventional wisdom in Washington. Whereas the first volume, published in 2002 at the height of the self-righteous nationalism gripping the capital after the September 11, 2001 attacks, hailed Bush’s self-confidence in acting to protect the homeland, the 2008 installment depicts the same man as cocksure and incurious. This much is not news. More educational are Woodward’s hints about the worldviews that will outlast this unpopular administration, embedded in the organs of the national security state. Full Story>>


Egypt Stifles Debate in the United States
Northwest Arkansas Times
August 27, 2008
Bayann Hamid

The Egyptian regime has once again succeeded in stifling freedom of speech, this time not in Egypt, but in the US. Earlier this month, an Egyptian court convicted a prominent Egyptian-American activist for his outspoken criticism of the regime’s poor human rights record in American public fora. The court accused Saad Eddin Ibrahim, of "tarnishing Egypt's image" abroad. The conviction referred primarily to writings he published in the foreign press; most notably among them an August 2007 op-ed in the Washington Post in which he criticized Egypt's human rights record and questioned the reasons behind US aid to Egypt. Full Story>>


Want to Fight Terrorism? Think Globally, Act Locally
Globe and Mail (Toronto),
August 4, 2008
Khalid Mustafa Medani

Militant Islam is under global scrutiny for clues to conditions that foster its rise, and to strategies for reversing that growth. But the key is not in Islamic doctrine, US foreign policy or formal ties to various nations, as many analysts have asserted. It lies at the community level, with clan and local leaders. Full Story>>


Iraq’s Kurds Have to Choose
Globe and Mail (Toronto)
July 30, 2008
Joost Hiltermann

Kurdish parties have become kingmakers in Baghdad , and they know it. As no federal government can work without them, they are pulling every available political lever to expand the territory and resources they control, trying to build the foundation of an independent Kurdish state. But even more than territory, they need security. If everyone acts quickly and wisely, that understanding could help resolve one of the Iraq war’s thorniest issues. Full Story>>


Exiting Iraq Is Easier Than They Say
The Nation (web-only)
July 16, 2008
Chris Toensing

The debate over the war in Iraq follows a yellowing script: The minute someone suggests that the US move to withdraw its troops, war supporters cry “Havoc!” True to form, when no less a figure than Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki stated he wants a timeline for a US pullout, John McCain summoned the specter of dire consequences. “I’ve always said we’ll come home with honor and with victory and not through a set timetable,” McCain said. In his major foreign policy speech on July 15, Barack Obama affirmed his support for a withdrawal timetable, adding that the US must “get out as carefully as we were careless getting in.” Obama’s position is the correct one, but he, like many other war critics, has done too little to counter the refrain that withdrawal is simply “cutting and running,” a recipe for disaster. Full Story>>

  Home | Contact/Intern | Background Info | Middle East Report | MER Online | Newspaper Op-Eds | Giving

Copyright © MERIP. All rights reserved.